On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:28 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > In http://bugs.python.org/issue18986 I proposed adding a new mapping > type to the collections module. I would *really* like for this to start outside the standard library. It needs to mature with user feedback before being dumped in the collections module (which was never intended to be a giant pile of every collection a person could think of). Adding yet more dictionary variants is an example of way-too-many-ways-to-do-it. Raymond -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130910/edc1a2fa/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4