Hello, In http://bugs.python.org/issue18986 I proposed adding a new mapping type to the collections module. The original use case is quite common in network programming and elsewhere (Eric Snow on the tracker mentioned an application with stock symbols). You want to have an associative container which matches keys case-insensitively but also preserves the original casing (e.g. for presentation). It is a commonly reimplemented container. It is also an instance of a more general pattern: match keys after applying a derivation (or coercion) function, but at the same time keep track of the original key. Note that the derivation function needn't be (and generally won't be) bijective, otherwise it's too simple. Therefore I propose adding the general pattern. Simple example: >>> d = transformdict(str.lower) >>> d['Foo'] = 5 >>> d['foo'] 5 >>> d['FOO'] 5 >>> list(d) ['Foo'] (case-insensitive but case-preserving, as the best filesystems are ;-)) On the tracker issue, it seems everyone agreed on the principle. There is some bikeshedding left to do, though. So here are the reasonable naming proposals so far: - transformkeydict - coercekeydict - transformdict - coercedict I have a sweet spot for "transformdict" myself. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4