On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 17:11:21 +0200, Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/09/13 21:34, R. David Murray wrote: > > Note that I said that single signon *itself* was overrated. If you > > use the same token to authenticate to multiple sites (and here the > > 'token' is the email address) then your identities on those sites > > are ipso facto associated with each other. *If* that email address > > is also never leaked (never displayed, even to other signed on > > users, all communication with the site encrypted), then you only > > have to worry if the sites exchange information about their > > accounts, or if the government comes knocking on their doors.... > > > > Yes, I'm paranoid. That doesn't mean they aren't listening. > > Being paranoid is good. Fix for this is actually trivial: Use > different emails for different "personalities". Yes, that's exactly my point. > If you are doing things you really NEED to hide, virtual machines and > TOR is the way to go. Well, it would helpful if a lot more people started routing traffic through TOR even when they didn't NEED to. I plan to start doing so soon. --David
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4