On 9 September 2013 09:02, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote: > 08.09.13 20:52, Guido van Rossum написав(ла): > >> Well, to me zip(*x) is unnatural, and it's inefficient when the arrays are >> long. > > Perhaps we need zip.from_iterable()? I would prefer it if chain.from_iterable were named something like flatten (as it is in the itertools recipes). Similarly transpose is a better name than zip.from_iterable. Oscar
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4