On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:14:09 -0700, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > On 09/06/2013 07:47 AM, Armin Rigo wrote: > > > > Are you suggesting that inspect.getmro(A) would return (A, object, > > type)? That seems very wrong to me. > > Currently, `inspect.getmro(A)` returns `(A, object)`. Which matches A.__mro__. EOD, I think. --David
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4