Hi Ethan, Are you suggesting that inspect.get_mro(A) would return (A, object, type)? That seems very wrong to me. If the goal is to fix `inspect.classify_class_attrs()`, then this function only needs a specific fix, along the lines of looking in `get_mro(A) + get_mro(type(A))`. (A more minor issue is that the bug report suggests `... + (type(A),)` only, but that's wrong: Python will also look in all the base classes of type(A).) "Fixing" inspect.get_mro() as suggested would break a lot of other usages of it. A bientôt, Armin.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4