RetroSearch Browse

Tue Oct 22 13:55:50 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-October/129811.html

On 22 October 2013 19:33, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> Am 20.10.13 14:27, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
>> I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org.
>
> This version looks good to me, and I accept it for inclusion in Python 3.4.
>
> I'd like to thank Nick for carefully editing this PEP, and I'd like to
> cite it as an archetype for a well-written PEP. It's very precise, and
> it elaborates on rejected proposals and the motivation for rejection.

Thank you! I have updated the PEP to record the acceptance, and
created a tracking issue for the implementation at
http://bugs.python.org/issue19347

> I'd also like to thank Donald for pushing this, and for continued work
> on the implementation of the PEP. I see that this all took longer than
> expected (also due to my fault in providing timely reviews). I suggest
> that some of the stuff that needs to be done still is delegated, so that
> Donald doesn't have to do all of it.

If we could get assistance with the installer and pyvenv updates after
the initial implementation of the module itself is checked in, that
would be a huge help.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-October/129811.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 453 (ensurepip) updated