RetroSearch Browse

Sat Oct 19 16:42:30 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-October/129750.html

On 19 October 2013 23:54, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
>> I don't follow this logic. There's now not even an existence check for the
>> base name, so it reads to me like we will look for all the possible init
>> file extensions even if there's *no* directory with an appropriate name.
>>
>> What am I missing?
>
>
> ``if cache_module in cache:``, the line above the _path_join() call and the
> guard that blocks the entire package search.

Ah, that's what I get for reviewing diffs on my phone and hence not
looking up the full context :)

Thanks for the clarification.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-October/129750.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #18810: Be optimistic with stat calls when seeing if a directory