On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 09:24:11AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > Even though it eventually > convinced me to change the name, this thread still epitomises everything > that sucks about soul destroying, energy draining bikeshed painting that > makes me wonder why I ever bother trying to make anything better. I feel your pain, I truly do, but I think the name you ended up with is much better than "ignore(d)". Given that naming things is one of the two hard problems of computer science[1], I think that a bit of pain to get the name just right is worth it. (You did decide on "suppress", right? I must admit I've only skimmed this thread.) In any case, thank you for seeing this through. [1] The other is cache invalidation. -- Steven
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4