On 10/15/2013 9:28 AM, PJ Eby wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:52 AM, R. David Murray<rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote: >> >I think 'trap' would be much clearer. > +1. Short and sweet, and just ambiguous enough that you don't leap to > the conclusion that the error is ignored. I agree that "suppress" is > basically a synonym for "ignore"; trap at least*implies* some kind of > control flow change, which is what's needed to prevent misconceptions. Yes, trap or catch imply a control flow change, ignore and suppress do not. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20131015/cdf34a68/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4