On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote: > And all of that just because the 3.4 deadling is looming. This makes me > somewhat sad about our process :-/ > Well, almost any process occasionally needs some pepper in the butt, and there's nothing like a hard deadline to get people to take some action. So I think this is actually appropriate. > And the comparison to Tulip is completely irrelevant. Every single thing > in Tulip is being heatedly discussed among multiple developers on the Tulip > list for many months now, and all code gets reviewed. > That may be, but it's not completely irrelevant -- the push for getting Tulip checked in was motivated by exactly the same deadline. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20131015/22bb085f/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4