I really want to get Argument Clinic in to Python 3.4. Currently the following is true: * It has an implementation I've been working on for more than a year. * I assert that it's a reasonable approach and the APIs are ready for public consumption. * The syntax for the DSL is the one proposed by Guido at PyCon US 2013. * So far It has little in the way of documentation apart from the PEP. * The PEP is out of date and not ready for pronouncement. * IIUC Guido said he's not delegating this PEP. There's now a discussion afoot about merging "tulip" in, in time for 3.4a4, which I think is going to happen. And as Release Manager for 3.4 I'm happy to see this happen. I'd like to propose much the same thing for Argument Clinic: check it in now, before 3.4a4, and let it bake in trunk a little before feature freeze at beta 1 while I run around and finish the documentation. You can review the existing code here: https://bitbucket.org/larry/python-clinic/ (Yes, in this fork clinic.py is at the root--but then I never intended to merge this fork.) Checking in Clinic would mean: * Adding the tool (one file, "clinic.py") and its test suite into Tools/clinic/ * Adding its documentation somewhere in the Doc/ directory * Merging six or eight places where I've converted random functions to use Clinic Brett Cannon gave the code a cursory review at PyCon CA over about six hours, and iirc he said it was basically reasonable. He wanted more coverage in the tests, and more in-depth review of course, but he had only minor feedback, all of which I've incorporated. (In case you're wondering: last time I tried, coverage from just the unit test suite was about 85%, but if you also ran all my sample usage of it in the CPython code it rose to like 92%.) So, quick poll: do you approve of me checking Argument Clinic in to Python 3.4 trunk in its current state before 3.4a4? //arry/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20131015/bc77c899/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4