RetroSearch Browse

Sat Oct 12 20:20:38 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-October/129482.html

12.10.13 21:04, Georg Brandl написав(ла):
> in light of the recent thread about PEPs not forming part of the docs,
> I've just pushed a change that allows to document C API elements
> not part of the limited API as such.  It is done like this:
>
> ... c:function:: int _PyTuple_Resize(PyObject **p, Py_ssize_t newsize)
>     :notlimited:
>
> I have not yet begun adding these to the documents; if someone wants to
> help with this I am glad for volunteers.

Why this is needed? The limited API is unstable and only developers of 
CPython can use it (but they can look in headers).

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-October/129482.html below:

[Python-Dev] Support for marking limited API elements in C API docs