A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-October/129476.html below:

[Python-Dev] cpython: Rename contextlib.ignored() to contextlib.ignore().

[Python-Dev] cpython: Rename contextlib.ignored() to contextlib.ignore(). [Python-Dev] cpython: Rename contextlib.ignored() to contextlib.ignore().MRAB python at mrabarnett.plus.com
Sat Oct 12 19:18:49 CEST 2013
On 12/10/2013 05:05, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 07:47 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> Nick Coghlan writes:
>>
>>   > (RDM is also right that the exception still has the effect of
>>   > terminating the block early, but I view names as mnemonics rather
>>   > than necessarily 100% accurate descriptions of things).
>>
>> This is just way too ambiguous for my taste.  I can't help reading
>
> [snippers]
>
>> How about
>>
>>      with contextlib.break_on(ExceptionIDontFeelLikeHandlingProperly):
>>          stmt1
>>          stmt2
>>          stmt3
>>
>> This is not 100% accurate Pythonically (there's no loop to break
>> here), but it does describe what the context manager does more
>> accurately, and it does effectively break out of the 'with' control
>> structure.
>
> +1  (if we have to have it)
>
> While I agree that mnemonics are helpful in the right circumstances, these aren't them, not for this name.  We aren't
> /just/ ignoring the exception, the exception is having a very real effect -- it's terminating the with block.
>
Perhaps "leave_on" would be more accurate.

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4