On 12/10/2013 05:05, Ethan Furman wrote: > On 10/11/2013 07:47 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> Nick Coghlan writes: >> >> > (RDM is also right that the exception still has the effect of >> > terminating the block early, but I view names as mnemonics rather >> > than necessarily 100% accurate descriptions of things). >> >> This is just way too ambiguous for my taste. I can't help reading > > [snippers] > >> How about >> >> with contextlib.break_on(ExceptionIDontFeelLikeHandlingProperly): >> stmt1 >> stmt2 >> stmt3 >> >> This is not 100% accurate Pythonically (there's no loop to break >> here), but it does describe what the context manager does more >> accurately, and it does effectively break out of the 'with' control >> structure. > > +1 (if we have to have it) > > While I agree that mnemonics are helpful in the right circumstances, these aren't them, not for this name. We aren't > /just/ ignoring the exception, the exception is having a very real effect -- it's terminating the with block. > Perhaps "leave_on" would be more accurate.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4