On Oct 12, 2013, at 09:06 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >I'm not too fussy about the name (clearly). We originally picked ignored(), >Raymond asked if he could change it to ignore() (and I said yes), Just as a point of order, it would be good to capture such side-channel discussions in the relevant issue. Mysterious decisions like this are easy to miss in the deluge of checkin messages, and don't help promote a transparent development process. Cheers, -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4