On 10/09/2013 08:09 AM, Larry Hastings wrote: > On 10/09/2013 04:45 PM, Anders J. Munch wrote: >> >> How about a naming convention instead, where using a leading >> underscore in a parameter name is a hint that it is positional-only. >> >> For example, the docstring of sorted: >> >> sorted(iterable, key=None, reverse=False) --> new sorted list >> >> would become: >> >> sorted(_iterable, key=None, reverse=False) --> new sorted list > > In any case, boy am I -1 on this. If you wish to continue this proposal further please write your own PEP. A leading underscore indicates a private implementation detail. The proposed signature now looks like we can provide a key and reverse, but only riskily provide the actual thing we want sorted. No warm fuzzy feelings there! ;) -1 -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4