On 10/09/2013 07:15 AM, Georg Brandl wrote: > We have quite a large > amount of C functions with positional-only parameters. Adding a "/" > to each of those is a) a tedious task and b) probably not helpful for > a lot of people: I volunteer to ensure that the "/"s are added if this PEP is accepted. (I expect I'd do it myself, but who knows, maybe a volunteer would appear out of the woodwork.) > ... and the "undefined" singleton just smells wrong. Another way > to spell "None" is just asking for trouble. It has to be a different value from "None", for the same reasons that all those other different-spellings-for-None (e.g. inspect.Parameter.empty) exist. I realize you are -1 on the proposal in general, but I'd be very interested if you could propose an alternate approach where I didn't need "a new spelling for None" as you put it. //arry/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20131009/b73454fb/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4