On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > I am for having a way to succintly properly describe the signature of C in > the manual and docstrings and help output. As it is now, the only safe thing > to do, without trial and exception, is to assume positional only unless one > knows otherwise. > > But the syntax should only be as complicated as needed for 'most' C > functions. If there are a few complicated oddballs, perhaps they could be > simplified, or given a special-case explanation. +1 -eric
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4