On 2013-11-26 18:16, Eli Bendersky wrote: > FWIW I'm not advocating a breaking behavior change here - I fully realize the > ship has sailed. I'm interested in mitigation actions, though. Making the > documentation explain this explicitly + adding an option to disable prefix > matching (in 3.5 since we're past the 3.4 features point) will go a long way for > alleviating this gotcha. There is already the One Obvious Way to handle situations like yours: the user uses "--" to mark that the remaining arguments are pure arguments and not --options. parent-script --verbose -- ./child_script.py --no-verbose --etc This is a common idiom across many argument processors. parse_known_args() is not a good solution for this situation even if you mitigate the prefix issue. Exact matches of --options are still possible. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4