Ethan Furman wrote: > [Redirecting to Python Dev] > > On 11/22/2013 10:25 AM, Richard Tew wrote: > >> Yet, we're told we should adopt wacky version numbers like 10, or >> rename our project from Stackless Python. > > Sometimes we have to do wacky stuff to avoid unnecessary confusion. Maybe imaginary version numbers could be used? Python 2.8j has a nice air of unreality about it. :-) -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4