On 22.11.13 00:53, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:43:37 -0500
> Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 21, 2013, at 06:36 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>
>>> As usual, 'I am not a lawyer', but if Christian wants to push forward with
>>> using 'Python 2.8', I suggest that he consult the PSF Trademark Committee and
>>> lawyer first.
>> Just to make clear, I'm definitely *not* suggesting this particular case ever
>> escalate to such a level. Chris is our friend and a nice guy. :)
>>
>> I'm just saying that I think we should avoid any possible confusion on the
>> part of ours (and Stackless's) users. And based on the discussions here,
>> there are plenty of good alternatives.
> +1 from me :-)
Thank you for that input! It was important and urgent, as I saw myself
jumping
into the wrong wagon, again.
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
Software Consulting : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14482 Potsdam : PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4