RetroSearch Browse

Thu Nov 21 19:18:12 CET 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-November/130475.html

Correct.
On Nov 21, 2013 10:15 AM, "Daniel Holth" <dholth at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 on unsorted repr(). It makes it obvious that the collection is not
> sorted.
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Christian Heimes <christian at python.org>
> wrote:
> > Am 21.11.2013 18:57, schrieb Tim Peters:
> >> Best to change the failing tests.  For example, _they_ can sort the
> >> dict keys if they rely on a fixed order.  Sorting in general is a
> >> dubious idea because it can be a major expense with no real benefit
> >> for most uses.
> >
> > I don't consider repr() as a performance critical function. It's mostly
> > used for debugging.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Python-Dev mailing list
> > Python-Dev at python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> > Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/dholth%40gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20131121/d5be5370/attachment-0001.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-November/130475.html below:

[Python-Dev] flaky tests caused by repr() sort order