On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Guido has told me that he was ready to approve PEP 428 (pathlib) in its
> latest amended form. Here is the last call for any comments or
> arguments against approval, before Guido marks the PEP accepted (or
> changes his mind :-)).
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
Isn't this redundant?
>>> Path.cwd()
PosixPath('/home/antoine/pathlib')
Probably this is just personal taste but I'd prefer the more explicit:
>>> Path(os.getcwd())
PosixPath('/home/antoine/pathlib')
I understand all the os.* replication (Path.rename, Path.stat etc.) but all
these methods assume you're dealing with an instantiated Path instance
whereas Path.cwd is the only one which doesn't.
Not a big deal anyway, it just catched my eye because it's different.
Other than that the module looks absolutely awesome and a big improvement
over os.path!
--- Giampaolo
https://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/
https://code.google.com/p/psutil/
https://code.google.com/p/pysendfile/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20131120/495b8c75/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4