On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:16:48 -0500 Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote: > Personally I think that none of the -O* should be removing asserts. It feels > like a foot gun to me. I’ve seen more than one codebase that would be > completely broken under -O* because they used asserts without even knowing > -O* existed. Originally it was probably done so as to mimick C, where compiling in optimized mode will indeed disable any assert()s in the code. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4