On 15 November 2013 06:48, Tim Peters <tim.peters at gmail.com> wrote: > Is that a feature? Or an accident? It's very surprising to find a > non-empty match inside an empty match (the outermost lookahead > assertion). Personally, I would read (?=(R))" as finding an empty match at a point where R starts. There's no implication that R is in any sense "inside" the match. (?=(\<\w\w\w\w\w\w)\w\w\w) finds the first 3 characters of words that are 6 or more characters long. Once again, the lookahead extends beyond the extent of the main match. It's obscure and a little bizarre, but I'd say its intended and a logical consequence of the definitions. Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4