On 11/14/2013 4:00 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 23:33:02 +0100 (CET) > christian.heimes <python-checkins at python.org> wrote: >> >> >> +Small string optimization >> +========================= >> + >> +Hash functions like SipHash24 have a costly initialization and finalization >> +code that can dominate speed of the algorithm for very short strings. On the >> +other hand Python calculates the hash value of short strings quite often. A >> +simple and fast function for especially for hashing of small strings can make 'for especially for hashing' is garbled. Delete first 'for'. >> +a measurably impact on performance. For example these measurements were taken 'measurable' >> +during a run of Python's regression tests. Additional measurements of other >> +code have shown a similar distribution. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4