On 23 maj 2013, at 20:59, PJ Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote: > As to the ability to do multiple types registration, you could support > it only in type annotations, e.g.: > > @func.register > def doit(foo: [int, float]): > ... Initially I thought so, too. But it seems other people might think this means "a sequence with the first element being an integer, and the second a float". The BDFL seems to have yet a different idea: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2012-December/018129.html This is clearly material for a separate PEP, wink wink, nudge nudge. To the point though. Based on this, and the fact PEP 8 currently disallows annotations within the standard library, I came to the conclusion that currently we should not include the annotation-driven form. > I generally lean towards returning the undecorated function, so that if you say: > > @func.register > def do_int(foo: int): > ... Me too. The PEP has been updated to specify that explicitly. -- Best regards, Łukasz Langa WWW: http://lukasz.langa.pl/ Twitter: @llanga IRC: ambv on #python-dev
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4