>> It should be no slower when it's all moved to C. > > The slowdown is too small to be interesting. The main point is that > there was no speedup, though. True, and thanks for testing. I don't think that's a big issue, however. If it's 3-8x faster in the majority of cases (local disk on all systems, Windows networking), and no slower in a minority (sshfs), I'm not too sad about that. I wonder how sshfs compared to nfs. -Ben
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4