On 5 May 2013 18:10, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 4 May 2013 16:42, Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> I've taken a quick look at it, but I probably won't be able to make any >> changes until the near the end of the coming week. Feel free to have a go; >> > > OK, I have a patch against the standalone pylauncher repo at > https://bitbucket.org/pmoore/pylauncher. I'm not sure what the best > approach is - I didn't want to patch the python core version directly (a) > because I wouldn't be able to test it easily, and (b) because I'd want a > standalone version anyway until 3.4 comes out. > Vinay, Did you get a chance to have a look at this? I didn't manage to create a pull request against your copy of pylauncher as my repo is a fork of the pypa one - I'm not sure if that's a limitation of bitbucket or if I just don't know how to do it... I've created a pull request against the pypa version in case that's of use... Paul -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130514/a538e9ee/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4