On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney at gmail.com>wrote: > On 5 May 2013 13:11, Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney at gmail.com> wrote: > >> @@ -142,6 +152,7 @@ >> if obj_type in (object, Enum): >> enum_item = object.__new__(enum_class) >> else: >> + value = obj_type.__new__(obj_type, value) >> enum_item = obj_type.__new__(enum_class, value) >> enum_item._value = value >> enum_item._name = e >> > > Bugger - this is wrong (it didn't feel right to me) - I'm sure it's only > working for me by accident. Need to think of something better. > > Tim Delaney > > Could you please split this off to a separate thread? I'd like to keep this one for raising issues with the actual contents of the PEP and discussing whether this version is good enough for pronouncement. Thanks, Eli -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130504/a7ccb0f1/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4