On 04/05/13 15:13, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Steven D'Aprano writes: > > > > Rather than risk obscure bugs, I would suggest restricting the extensions > > > to 3 characters. For the “Windowed Python ZIP Applications” case, could we > > > use .pzw as the extension instead of .pyzw? > > +0 > > > Many official Microsoft file extensions are four or more letters, > > e.g. docx. > > Give us a non-MS example, please. Nobody in their right mind would > clash with a major MS product's naming conventions. Not even if their > file format implements Digital-Ocular Coordination eXtensions. And a > shell that borks the Borg's extensions won't make it in the market. I'm afraid I don't understand your question. Are you suggesting that four letter extensions are restricted to Microsoft products? If so, that would be an excellent reason to avoid .pyzw, but I don't believe that is the case. Common 4+ letter extensions include .html, .tiff, .jpeg, .mpeg, .midi, .java and .torrent. -- Steven
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4