On Thu, 2 May 2013 14:16:34 -0700 Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > On May 02, 2013, at 10:57 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > >On Thu, 2 May 2013 13:48:24 -0700 > >> The problem with (5) is this: you use some library that exports an > >> enumeration, and you want to use pickling. Now you depend on the way the > >> library implemented - if it used the convenience API, you can't pickle. If > >> it used the class API, you can. > > > >A good reason to ditch the function-based syntax. > > Why? Not everything is picklable. Oh well. Then why insist on the _getframe hack? You are losing me: are you bothered by picklability or not? ;-) If you are not, then fine, let's just make the function-based version *documentedly* unpicklable, and move along. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4