On May 01, 2013, at 08:47 PM, Georg Brandl wrote: >Wait a moment... it might not be immediately useful for IntEnums (however, >that's because base Enum currently defines __int__ which I find questionable), And broken. And unnecessary. :) >>> class Foo(Enum): ... a = 'a' ... b = 'b' ... >>> int(Foo.a) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: __int__ returned non-int (type str) ...remove Enum.__int__()... >>> class Bar(int, Enum): ... a = 1 ... b = 2 ... >>> int(Bar.a) 1 So yes, Enum.__int__() should be removed. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4