On May 01, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: >Actually, in flufl.enum, IntEnum had to define a magic __value_factory__ >attribute, but in the current ref435 implementation this isn't needed, so >IntEnum is just: > >class IntEnum(int, Enum): > ''' > Class where every instance is a subclass of int. > ''' > >So why don't we just drop IntEnum from the API and tell users they should >do the above explicitly, i.e.: +1 -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4