RetroSearch Browse

Fri Mar 22 00:37:57 CET 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-March/124890.html

On 3/21/2013 2:23 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:19:42 -0400, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:

>> How does this look? Is ``replacement`` right? Should the subsequent sm
>> by itself be marked? If so, how?
>>
>> * :meth:`difflib.SequenceMatcher.isbjunk` and
>>     :meth:`difflib.SequenceMatcher.isbpopular`: use ``x in sm.bjunk`` and
>>     ``x in sm.bpopular``, where sm is a SequenceMatcher object.
>
> Looks fine to me.  A link on SequenceMatcher probably isn't necessary,
> but might be handy.  If you want to add it it would be
> :class:`~difflib.SequenceMatcher`.

Committed and pushed.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-March/124890.html below:

[Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #13248: removed deprecated and undocumented difflib.isbjunk, isbpopular.