RetroSearch Browse

Thu Mar 21 19:13:00 CET 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-March/124880.html

On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:57:54 -0700
Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> 
> > Right.  Ultimately, I think IDLE should be a separate project entirely, but I
> > guess there's push back against that too.
> 
> The most important feature of IDLE is that it ships with the standard library.
> Everyone who clicks on the Windows MSI on the python.org webpage
> automatically has IDLE.   That is why I frequently teach Python with IDLE.
> 
> If this thread results in IDLE being ripped out of the standard distribution,
> then I would likely never use it again.

Which says a lot about its usefulness, if the only reason you use it is
that it's bundled with the standard distribution.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-March/124880.html below:

[Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib