On 18 Mar, 2013, at 23:43, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote: > On 03/18/2013 02:29 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: >> On 18 Mar, 2013, at 8:16, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote: >>> This has some consequences. For example, inspect.getfullargspec, inspect.Signature, and indeed types.FunctionObject and types.CodeObject have no currently defined mechanism for communicating that a parameter is positional-only. >> inspect.Signature does have support for positional-only arguments, they have inspect.Parameter.POSITIONAL_ONLY as their kind. > > You're right! And I should have remembered that--I was one of the authors of the inspect.Signature PEP. It's funny, it can represent something that it has no way of inferring ;-) It doesn't necessarily have to, builtin functions could grow a __signature__ attribute that calculates the signature (possibly from the DSL data). I've done something like that in a pre-release version of PyObjC, and with some patching of pydoc and inspect (see #17053) I now have useful help information for what are basicly builtin functions with positional-only arguments. Ronald -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130318/16afbe8a/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4