RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 18 23:43:10 CET 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-March/124755.html

On 03/18/2013 02:29 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> On 18 Mar, 2013, at 8:16, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:
>> This has some consequences.  For example, inspect.getfullargspec, inspect.Signature, and indeed types.FunctionObject and types.CodeObject have no currently defined mechanism for communicating that a parameter is positional-only.
> inspect.Signature does have support for positional-only arguments, they have inspect.Parameter.POSITIONAL_ONLY as their kind.

You're right!  And I should have remembered that--I was one of the 
authors of the inspect.Signature PEP.  It's funny, it can represent 
something that it has no way of inferring ;-)

//arry/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130318/e6ed2a1a/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-March/124755.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: New DSL syntax and slightly changed semantics for the Argument Clinic DSL.