A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-March/124731.html below:

New DSL syntax and slightly changed semantics for the Argument Clinic DSL.

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: New DSL syntax and slightly changed semantics for the Argument Clinic DSL. [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: New DSL syntax and slightly changed semantics for the Argument Clinic DSL.Ronald Oussoren ronaldoussoren at mac.com
Mon Mar 18 10:29:49 CET 2013
On 18 Mar, 2013, at 8:16, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:

> 
> This has some consequences.  For example, inspect.getfullargspec, inspect.Signature, and indeed types.FunctionObject and types.CodeObject have no currently defined mechanism for communicating that a parameter is positional-only.  I strongly assert we need such a mechanism, though it could be as simple as having the parameter name be an empty string or None.

inspect.Signature does have support for positional-only arguments, they have inspect.Parameter.POSITIONAL_ONLY as their kind.  The others probably don't have support for this kind of parameters because there is no Python syntax for creating them.

Ronald
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4