On 18 Mar, 2013, at 8:16, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote: > > This has some consequences. For example, inspect.getfullargspec, inspect.Signature, and indeed types.FunctionObject and types.CodeObject have no currently defined mechanism for communicating that a parameter is positional-only. I strongly assert we need such a mechanism, though it could be as simple as having the parameter name be an empty string or None. inspect.Signature does have support for positional-only arguments, they have inspect.Parameter.POSITIONAL_ONLY as their kind. The others probably don't have support for this kind of parameters because there is no Python syntax for creating them. Ronald
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4