A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-March/124621.html below:

[Python-Dev] built-in Python test runner (was: Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda)

[Python-Dev] built-in Python test runner (was: Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda) [Python-Dev] built-in Python test runner (was: Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda)Lennart Regebro regebro at gmail.com
Wed Mar 6 07:39:53 CET 2013
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Donald Stufft <donald.stufft at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't care much what that mechanism is, but I think the easiest way
> to get there is to tell people to extend distutils with a test command
> (or use Distribute) and perhaps add such a command in 3.4 that will do
> the unittest discover thingy. I remember looking into zope.testrunner
> hooking into that mechanism as well, but I don't remember what the
> outcome was.
>
> Doesn't setuptools/distribute already have a setup.py test command?

Yes, but distutils do not.

> That seems like the easiest way forward?

Yup. Although I can understand people if they want something that is
independent of packaging/distribution.

//Lennart
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4