On 5 March 2013 13:21, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote: > > We can certainly talk about it - although as Guido says, something specific may be easier to have a useful discussion about. > > Reading through your blog articles it seemed like a whole lot of subunit context was required to understand the specific > proposal you're making for the TestResult. It also *seems* like you're redesigning the TestResult for a single use case > (distributed testing) with an api that looks quite "odd" for anything that isn't that use case. I'd rather see how we can > make the TestResult play *better* with those requirements. That discussion probably belongs in another thread - or at > the summit. Right - all I wanted was to flag that you and I and any other interested parties should discuss this at the summit :). -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Cloud Services
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4