On 3/4/2013 11:36 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Brian Curtin <brian at python.org > <mailto:brian at python.org>> wrote: > > The full announcement is at > http://blog.python.org/2013/03/introducing-electronic-contributor.html, > but a summary follows. > > We've now moved to an electronic Contributor License Agreement form at > http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ which will hopefully > ease the signing and sending of forms for our potential contributors. > The form shows the required fields whether you're signing as an > individual or a representative of an organization, and removes the > need to print, scan, fax, etc. > > When a new contributor fills in the form, they are emailed a copy of > the form and asked to confirm the email address that they used (and > received that copy at). Upon confirming, the signed form is sent to > the PSF Administrator and filed away. > > The signature can either be generated from your typed name, or you can > draw or upload your actual written signature if you choose. > > > With this in place I would like to propose that all patches submitted to > bugs.python.org <http://bugs.python.org> must come from someone who has > signed the CLA before we consider committing it (if you want to be truly > paranoid we could say that we won't even look at the code w/o a CLA). Either policy could be facilitated by tracker changes. In order to see the file upload box, one must login and the tracker knows who has a CLA on file (as indicated by a * suffix on the name). If a file is uploaded by someone without, a box could popup with the link to the e-form and a message that a CLA is required. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4