2013/3/4 Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> > On 01.03.13 17:24, Stefan Bucur wrote: > >> Before digging deeper into the issue, I wanted to ask here if there are >> any implicit assumptions about string identity and interning throughout >> the interpreter implementation. For instance, are two single-char >> strings having the same content supposed to be identical objects? >> > > I think this is not a bug if the code relies on the fact that an empty > string is a singleton. This obviously is an immutable object and there is > no public method to create different empty string. Really? >>> x = u'\xe9'.encode('ascii', 'ignore') >>> x == '', x is '' (True, False) -- Amaury Forgeot d'Arc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130304/d703ebcc/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4