On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote: > On 4 March 2013 19:40, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Your feedback on http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 would be greatly appreciated. > > Done directly to Antoine on IRC the other day in a conversation with > him and Michael about the compatability impact of subtests. Happy to > do a full code review if that would be useful. The extra set of eyes couldn't hurt (and if you can spot a better way to tie @expectedfailure into the rest of the test running machinery, that would be great. Making sure that decorator doesn't break is the ugliest part of the whole patch) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4