RetroSearch Browse

Sat Mar 2 16:37:56 CET 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-March/124504.html

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> It's that case where the process that added the modules is separate
> from the process scanning for them, and the communication is one way,
> where the heuristic is important. Explicit invalidation only works
> when they're the *same* process, or when they're closely coupled so
> the adding process can tell the scanning process to invalidate the
> caches (our test suite is mostly the former although there are a
> couple of cases of the latter).

s/are/may be/ (I don't actually remember if there are or not off the
top of my head)

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-March/124504.html below:

[Python-Dev] Planning on removing cache invalidation for file finders