On 28 Jun 2013 07:46, "PJ Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd be tempted to kill PEP 422 as not worth the hassle if we did this. > > I assume you mean the "namespace" keyword part of PEP 422, since PEP > 422's class initialization feature is entirely orthogonal to > definition order or namespace customization. (Indeed, I cannot recall > a single instance of class initialization in my code that actually > *cared* about definition order. Certainly I haven't had any > situations where a pre-existing definition order would've eliminated > the need for a class-level initialization.) That and the second argument to the new initialisation hook. So you're right, the consequences for PEP 422 would be "greatly simplify" rather than "kill". Cheers, Nick. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130628/b6925062/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4