RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jun 18 08:08:22 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-June/126929.html

On 06/17/2013 09:05 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com <mailto:storchaka at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     14.06.13 11:46, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла):
>
>         On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 07:06:49 +0200 (CEST)
>         raymond.hettinger <python-checkins at python.org <mailto:python-checkins at python.org>> wrote:
>
>             http://hg.python.org/cpython/__rev/5accb0ac8bfb <http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5accb0ac8bfb>
>             changeset:   84116:5accb0ac8bfb
>                 Fix comment blocks.  Adjust blocksize to a power-of-two for better divmod computations.
>
>
>         Is there any rationale for changing the heuristic from "fits in a whole
>         number of cachelines" to "allows fast division by the blocksize"?
>
>         I personally would prefer if such changes were justified a bit more
>         than by a one-liner changeset message without any corresponding open
>         issue.
>
>
>     I share the doubts of Antoine and I was going to write the same comment. I thought there were good reasons for
>     previous code. What has changed?
>
>
> I agree it would be interesting to hear about the reasons for the change. Raymond?

Asking as a learner:  are such non-bugfix changes appropriate for the 2.7 line?

--
~Ethan~

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-June/126929.html below:

[Python-Dev] cpython (2.7): Fix comment blocks. Adjust blocksize to a power-of-two for better divmod