RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jun 16 09:31:29 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-June/126892.html

On 16 June 2013 15:58, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
>
> On Jun 16, 2013, at 1:52 AM, Ben Finney <ben+python at benfinney.id.au> wrote:
>
> Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> writes:
>
> On Jun 15, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Ben Finney <ben+python at benfinney.id.au> wrote:
>
> Is there anything I can do to keep the ‘enum’ package online for
> continuity but make it clear, to automated tools, that this is
> end-of-life and obsoleted by another package?
>
>
> Right now the best you can do is make a note of it. Pep 426 let's you
> do what you want.
>
>
> Thanks. What specifically in PEP 426 do you mean; how would I make a
> note of “this package is end-of-life as is, please migrate to
> ‘flufl.enum’ instead” using PEP 426 metadata?
>
>
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0426/#obsoleted-by
>
> Note PEP426 isn't completed and isn't implemented :)

That specific bit is stable, though :)

Cheers,
Nick.

--
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-June/126892.html below:

[Python-Dev] backported Enum