On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:25:26PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 25 July 2013 20:38, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 24, 2013 6:37 AM, "Brett Cannon" <brett at python.org> wrote: > >> The key, though, is adding python2 and getting your code to use that > >> binary specifically so that shifting the default name is more of a > >> convenience than something which might break existing code not ready for the > >> switch. > >> > > Applicable to this, does anyone know whether distutils, setuptools, distlib, > > or any of the other standard build+install tools are doing shebang > > requiring? Are they doing the right thing wrt python vs python2? > > It occurs to me they're almost certainly using "sys.executable" to set > the shebang line, so probably not :( > > distutils-sig could probably offer a better answer though, most of the > packaging folks don't hang out here. > Thanks! For other Linux distributors following along, here's my message to distutils-sig: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2013-July/022001.html -Toshio -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130725/aebd5ae7/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4