On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: >> On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 16:36:35 -0700 >> Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Our current Mac OS X builds use GCC-4.2. >>> >>> On Python2.7, I ran a comparison of gcc-4.2.1 builds >>> versus gcc-4.8.1 and found that the latter makes a much >>> faster Python. PyBench2.0 shows the total running time >>> dropping from 5653ms to 4571ms. The code is uniformly >>> better in just about every category. >> >> You could try running the benchmarks suite to see what that gives: >> http://hg.python.org/benchmarks/ >> >> Regards >> >> Antoine. > > or pypy benchmark suite which is more comprehensive for python 2.7 > (http://bitbucket.org/pypy/benchmarks) Besides, is there any reason not to use clang by default on OS X?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4